Code of Conduct

Experts must maintain complete independence from parties and outcomes. The expert's primary duty is to the court, not to the instructing party. Experts must not allow their opinions to be influenced by the interests of any party.

Experts must not act as advocates for any party. Expert evidence should be, and should be seen to be, impartial and objective. Experts must not omit material facts or evidence that might detract from their opinions.

Experts must disclose any potential conflicts of interest before accepting an engagement. This includes financial, personal, professional, or other relationships that could affect independence.

Expert opinions must be based on facts that are within the expert's knowledge or that are assumed. All facts and assumptions must be clearly stated in the expert's report.

Experts must apply methods and techniques that are accepted within their profession or field of expertise. Where multiple methods exist, the expert should explain why the chosen method is appropriate.

The reasoning process leading to expert opinions must be transparent and documented. Reports must explain how conclusions were reached, including any limitations or qualifications.

If an expert becomes aware of an error in their report or testimony, they must promptly notify all parties and the court. Experts must be willing to revise opinions if warranted.

Experts must maintain confidentiality of all information received in connection with their engagement. Information must not be disclosed except as required by law or court order.

Experts must comply with all applicable court rules and procedures, including the Civil Procedure Act and relevant court practice notes.

Experts must comply with all EWI standards, policies, and procedures, including the EWI Quality Assurance Framework. Participation in quality assurance is mandatory.